The value of the prognostic scales acute physiology and chronic health evaluation APACHE II and Simplified Acute Physiology Score SAPS III, in the cost-benefit of patients admitted to the intensive care unit
- MOJ Sports Medicine
-
Manzo Palacios Ervin MD,1 García Miranda GM MD,2 De la Cruz López José MD3
PDF Full Text
Abstract
Background:
The
objective of intensive care units is to modify mortality caused by the onset of
acute failure of one or more organ systems. However, in practice, diverse
criteria are used, such as ethical and moral factors, bed availability, lack of
intermediate monitoring areas, and various reasons that lead to high hospital
costs. Disease severity indices such as the MPM (Mortality Probability Models)
and APACHE (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation) scores should be
useful in the pre-admission stage and during the patient's stay in the ICU in
order to rationalize therapeutic interventions. It must be acknowledged,
however, that they are impractical when we are called upon to determine ICU
admission.
Methods: All patients
admitted to the Intensive Care Unit of the Angeles Metropolitano Hospital, of
septic and non-septic origin, were studied. The APACHE II (Acute Physiology and
Chronic Health Evaluation) scores and SAPS III (Simplified Acute Physiology
Score) variables were determined. The determination is made through the
intervals, which include APACHE> 30 points, APACHE: 20-30 points, and APACHE
<30 points and concomitantly; the SAPS III was calculated for each group,
the mortality percentage was determined and through the accounts department,
the daily cost per department and segment assigned to the patients was obtained
to define the unit cost. The APACHE II and SAPS III determination was performed
upon admission and 48 hours later, data collection was done in a format
specially designed for the study.
Results: A total of 48
patients were admitted during the study period, 47.91% were male. The mean age
was 55.79 ± 18.5 years. APACHE scores were
determined with intervals: + 30 points: 5 patients, 20-30 points: 11 patients,
and -20 points: 32 patients. The number of deaths according to the APACHE
intervals: > 30 points: 4 patients, 20-30: 5 patients, <20: 2 patients.
The overall mortality was 22.91%. Days of stay for APACHE intervals:> 30: 2 ± 2.2 days/patient, 20-30: 10 ± 12.9 days/patient and <20: 5.70 ± 4.8 days/patient, costs according to APACHE upon
admission: >30 points = Total = $41,911.92 USD (cost/day: $8,382.39 ± 10,829.11 USD), 20-30 points: $147,017.87 USD
(cost day: $12,966.24 ± 9,629.25 USD),
<20 points: $409,875.09 USD (cost/day $12,809.76 ±
11,120.14 USD). APACHE <20: SAPS III 47.5313 ±
11.21 points, mortality 20.0938 ± 14.074%.
APACHE 20-30: SAPS III 61.66 ± 18.31 points,
mortality 48.6333 ± 23.3274%. APACHE >
30: SAPS III 78.00 ± 15.18223 points,
mortality 65.0 ± 20.78461%.
Conclusions: It is observed
that the highest cost is in patients with an APACHE < 20 points, but with a
greater number of days of stay and with a greater survival rate, and it is
expected that the highest number of deaths can be observed with APACHE score
levels > 30 points, as well as in the range of 20-30 points.
Keywords
bed availability,initiating therapeutic measures,determine ICU admission