Persistent severe stress and carcinogenesis: prisma-based systematic review of biological mechanisms and epidemiological evidence
- Nursing & Care Open Access Journal
-
Agussalim, Abd Rahman, Syarifuddin
PDF Full Text
Abstract
Background: Chronic severe
psychological stress has long been hypothesized to contribute to cancer
development and progression via neuroendocrine, immunological, and inflammatory
pathways. However, evidence remains inconsistent and a comprehensive synthesis
is lacking.
Objective: This review aims
to systematically evaluate existing preclinical and clinical literature,
elucidating biological mechanisms by which persistent severe stress may
influence carcinogenesis, and to assess epidemiological associations between
chronic stress exposure and cancer incidence, progression, or survival.
Methods: We conducted a systematic search
of MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, Web of Science, and publisher databases (Elsevier,
Wiley, SAGE, BMC) up to May 2025. Search terms included combinations of
“psychological stress,” “chronic stress,” “stressful life events,” “cancer,”
“carcinogenesis,” “tumour progression,” and related immunologic,
neuroendocrine, and molecular keywords. Two independent reviewers screened
titles/abstracts and full texts, applied predefined inclusion and exclusion
criteria, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. The review was carried out
following PRISMA guidelines. Both mechanistic (animal / in vitro) and human
(observational, clinical) studies were included.
Results: Of 4,312 records identified, 38
full-text articles met inclusion criteria (preclinical mechanistic studies,
observational cohort/case–control studies, and systematic reviews). Mechanistic
evidence consistently shows that chronic stress induces activation of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal
(HPA) axis and sympathetic nervous system (SNS), elevates catecholamines and
glucocorticoids, impairs cytotoxic immune surveillance, elevates
pro-inflammatory cytokines, promotes angiogenesis and extracellular matrix
remodeling, and creates a tumor-permissive microenvironment, thereby
facilitating tumor initiation, growth, and metastasis. Clinically,
epidemiological findings are mixed: some large meta-analyses report modest
positive associations between psychosocial stressors (e.g., depression,
anxiety) and overall cancer incidence or mortality, while others find no
consistent association. The quality of evidence is limited by heterogeneity in
stress definitions, measurement methods, and confounding by lifestyle factors.
Conclusion: Preclinical and
translational evidence supports biologically plausible pathways linking
persistent severe stress with carcinogenesis and tumor progression. However,
human epidemiological evidence remains inconsistent and insufficient to
establish causality. Well-designed prospective studies with validated stress
measures and biomarker assessment, as well as interventional trials targeting
stress pathways, are needed.
Implications for Nursing: Screening for
chronic stress, integrating stress-management interventions, and facilitating
psychosocial support may contribute to cancer prevention strategies and improve
outcomes in clinical care.
Keywords
hronic psychological stress, carcinogenesis, neuroendocrine–immune mechanisms, hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis, tumor progression, epidemiological evidence


